The Big YouTube De-Monetization

For those who are unaware, Youtube currently has an extensive array of policies for content creators (which you can view here). These are called the YouTube’s Terms of Service. Basically, these are regulations that Youtuber’s must follow to be eligible to make a profit from their content. These regulations must be followed in order to be advertiser friendly. Content that is considered “not advertiser-friendly” includes, but is not limited to:

If content creators fail to abide by these set of rules, involving formal regulations, guidelines and censorship, Youtuber’s risk having their videos demonetized. This threatens the livelihood of many big creators, as Youtube is their source of income.

Sounds pretty clear, right? Just abide by the rules and regulations and continue to earn an income from your videos.

Wrong.

These regulations have been made active since 2012. Content creators have been made unaware of these terms and essentially feel ripped off, lied to and ultimately deceived. The ‘dodginess’ continues with some more sly moves from Youtube. Recently, five years worth of de-monetized video notifications flooded into creators’ inboxes.  I can’t be the only one thinking that this is unfair to content creators, and oh, way too late! These unclearly stated policies seem to be forging a wedge between the once sense of community between content creators and the other big guys, Youtube. Successful Youtuber Casey Neistat explains this well:

Well known Youtuber PewDiePie expresses his opinion and a run down on the newly enforced policies too. You can watch it unfold here:

Another element to this whole saga is the process used to approve “advertiser friendly” content. Youtube strongly relies on technology to determine whether a video may or may not conform to these guidelines. These technologies, according to Youtube’s Advertiser Friendly Content Guidelines include:

In summary, these ‘technologies’ are all just a bunch of algorithmic filters. How fair and accurate is this approach?

There is a light at the end of this tunnel for Youtuber’s who have their income compromised by not meeting these regulations – if your content is deemed non-monetary you are able to request a video review. According to Youtube themselves, the “review time depends on a variety of factors, such as video and channel performance, the history of videos you’ve submitted for monetization, and the eligibility of your content”. I’d like to see how effective and fair this process is.

References:

Berndt, K 2016, Youtube Logo, viewed 21 September 2016, < http://nouw.com/katrinberndt/stop-the-youtube-drama-25129593 > .

Internet Creators Guild 2016, ‘ YouTube De-Monetization Explained’, Internet Creators Guild , viewed 21 September 2016, < https://medium.com/internet-creators-guild/youtube-de-monetization-explained-44464f902a22#.vjba3388r>

Youtube 2016, ‘Advertiser-friendly content guidelines’,  Youtube, viewed 21 September 2016, < https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6162278?hl=en>

 

 

 

Advertisements

One Reply to “The Big YouTube De-Monetization”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s